On 25/05/26 9:32 am, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 26/04/26 6:25 pm, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: >> Thanks for opening MRs instead of doing a direct revert, and thanks >> for creating two MRs so people can vote between moving the new changes >> under the title "Proposed" (!22) instead of just throwing away all >> changes (!21) that went in via multiple MRs over several weeks. >> Hopefully more people will cast their vote. Currently the 3 people who >> have voted to throw away the changes and a completely separate group >> of people from those 7 people who participated in making them, so if >> you intend to merge !21, I think it should have at least 8 or more >> votes before you merge it. > The threshold has been reached now. There are now 8 votes on !21 and > 5 on !22 (with downvotes of 1 and 2 respectively). > > Richard Hansen, who was the one preparing all the changes over several > months, and whose changes were are talking about reverting also voted > in favour of !21 and downvoted !22. > > I think there is not much (or any) confusion now, and !21 can and should > be merged. I'd still like to have a buffer window if in case more folks > would like to give feedback. So I'll wait for a month (until June 25) > from now before hitting the merge button. Will also send a reminder > mail 1 day before merging this.
I'll merge !21 by tomorrow end of the day, roughly ~24-30h from now. Thanks!
