Hi Otto, and Team, Sorry for made the confusion made in the Team. It's all my fault not Macros', as I only documented it on wiki and didn't provide additional communication on mailing. And I have been busy and sick right after DebConf. And just read this thread by now.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 9:04 PM Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Marcos! > I am happy to review your MR if you now want to follow-up on this and > ensure that the actually works for e.g. these packages you modified: > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/gomuks/-/tree/debian/sid/debian > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/fq/-/tree/debian/sid/debian > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/lf/-/tree/debian/master/debian > > Just tag me @otto in any MR you create and I will try to review it as > quickly as possible. Not sure if you read the Go Team Sprint page in phase 2 that we need rebuild test for Go package that ships executable binary with dh-golang 1.66+: https://wiki.debian.org/DebConf/26/Sprints/DebianGoTeam/GoModBuilds This way helps us to spot the issues in new dh-golang 1.66 tooling, And we can share the FTBFS log easily for fixing the corrsponding -dev package in unstable or fix it it's a bug in dh-golang 1.66. I don't think we should require experienced DD to submit MR review like a new contributor for each of rebuild tests with salsa-ci. Can someone in the team who familar more on salsa-ci help the team on this directly? Only for the packages that listed on the wiki page for now. I think it would be much quicker and better to shortern the tooling transition time, am I correct? Best regards, -- -Andrew
