>> "JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Christian, > we really should have a real GNOME-2 transition plan.
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 08:28:33PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: >> May be sawfish2 will be moved in unstable with the sawfish name. > What should we do? Will we upload packages with the 2 suffix to > unstable or will we not? At the moment I think that we will have a > long GNOME-1.4 -> GNOME-2 transition phase. So we should at least > consider to have sawfish and sawfish2 in unstable simultaneously. > Advantage: the user can choose at which point he switches to > GNOME-2. I agree. > Disadvantage: we have to solve the problems which I indicated > in the thread titled "GNOME-2 transition plan". Really a big problem. I've started to write a reply to the "GNOME-2 transition plan" thread this morning, and I've never finished. I really don't like how GNOME 2 can be configured and lost functionalities. Right now I don't have GNOME 2 installed on my machine for the following reasons : No more panel menu editing. No more favorites menu. The panel isn't dynamically resized. Sawfish can be configured as I want in 1.4 A lot of applets has been removed. Some binaries has been removed from gnome-utils. May be some features above are bugs. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
