On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:16:25AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > So, I strongly agree with the earlier discussion that involved conflicting > package-name2 packages sitting alongside their package-name GNOME 1.x > friends in unstable. Later on, when the integration/migration issues have > been resolved, the packages can be renamed.
That sounds eminently sensible, to me. > I don't believe that pinning > packages is a workable solution (I've never pinned a package, and I don't > believe I should be required to do so, unless Debian suddenly adopted a > "let's be a complete pigsty and not an integrated, sensible distribution" > policy, which would shock and amaze me). Agree 100% There is a disturbing trend of some posters here to regard the distribution name "unstable" as an invitation to actively make it so. I really don't understand that mentality. -S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
