On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 12:43, Christian Marillat wrote: > Actually both nautilus are in unstable.
Ok, right. But he shouldn't replace the nautilus 1.0 in unstable with nautilus2 yet. So I think it makes sense to put nautilus 2.0 in experimental without the 2 suffix. > I've stopped my work on that scripts when Raphael as filed the ctte bug > two months ago. Well, since nothing useful has come from -ctte, we should just ignore them and finish the s/2// transition, then get a rough working version of the transition scripts, and then upload to unstable. After that we should try to get the whole mass into testing at once. > I'm not sure if Red-Hat did some scripts for that. I'll try to check the > G2 rpm Ok, I will do that too. Do you want to split up the work? I can handle the gnome-panel transition scripts if you like. > > At least in our case though, we could pretty easily hack gnome-session > > so it would test whether the user had a ~/.gnome but not a ~/.gnome2, > > and offer to run the transition scripts then. Make sense? > > Not sufficient because G2 now use gconf and only some files in ~/.gnome > are still used in G2 Huh? I don't see how that's relevant. What we want is a way to test whether this is the user's first time running GNOME 2. I thought about this a bit more, and I realized that since gnome-terminal 2.0 is already in unstable, users will already have a ~/.gnome2 directory. I think testing for ~/.gnome2/panel2.d should be sufficient.
