Ryan Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> Things seem to be a lot more broken then they usually are - something to do > with the gcc 3.2 transition? As I said before I don't have any problem :) Christian
Ryan Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> Things seem to be a lot more broken then they usually are - something to do > with the gcc 3.2 transition? As I said before I don't have any problem :) Christian