Yes, I think a separate repository is a good idea to people test Gnome 2.4, without break the current gnome in sid...
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:51:23 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:33:42PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="Julien Portalier">
> >
> > > I'm not sure of that, for the moment we want to see Gnome 2.2 in
> > > testing so i don't think we should upload Gnome 2.4 right now.
> > >
> > > But having it prepared in experimental might be a good idea.
> > >
> > > What do Gnome maintainers say ?
> >
> > I agree, given the state of testing. More important to get that stable
> > than having pre-2.4 stuff in sid. Experimental, or a separate
> > repository would be ideal.
>
> I would vote for a repository, it is too easy to get random not wanted
> stuff from experimental together with what you really want.
>
> In truth, we would need a group of smaller experimental repositories,
> with autobuilders attached too.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Andr� Filipe de Assun��o e Brito
decko em #debian-br @ irc.debian.org
ICQ#45427385 / JabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sitio == http://filipebrito.blogspot.com
Camarada Socialista Engenheiro de Final de Semana
Artista de Rua Tradutor solid�rio
CIPSGA - Software Livre no Brasil -> http://www.cipsga.org.br
Projeto Debian-BR -> http://www.debian-br.org
Projeto Debian-SP -> http://sp.debian-br.org
pgpp5KqxgKm7l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
