On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 16:08, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > That'd be Mika (Cc:'ed) -- the wonders of writing emails offline and > having a bad memory for names :-)
We seem to have made no progress. Mika, can you upload a new version of Celestia please? You don't need to do very much except build-depend on libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.0.6-2) so that it will not build with a libgtk2.0-0png3 version of the package. Akira, you didn't reply to me at all. Celestia is the only package remaining in unstable in all sections in all architectures that still uses libgtk2.0-0png3. Seeing as it has never been in a release we can remove it now without any ill effects. If we release with it, we'll be stuck with it for another 2 years or something. Will you do a new version of Gtk+ that removes libgtk2.0-0png3 and makes libgtk2.0-0 conflict and replace it? Regards, Rob
