Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 16:08, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: >> That'd be Mika (Cc:'ed) -- the wonders of writing emails offline and >> having a bad memory for names :-) > > We seem to have made no progress. Mika, can you upload a new version of > Celestia please? You don't need to do very much except build-depend on > libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.0.6-2) so that it will not build with a > libgtk2.0-0png3 version of the package. > > Akira, you didn't reply to me at all. Celestia is the only package > remaining in unstable in all sections in all architectures that still > uses libgtk2.0-0png3. Seeing as it has never been in a release we can > remove it now without any ill effects. If we release with it, we'll be > stuck with it for another 2 years or something. Will you do a new > version of Gtk+ that removes libgtk2.0-0png3 and makes libgtk2.0-0 > conflict and replace it?
Also gtk 2.2.3 is out and should be packaged in the same time. Christian
