Le Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:23:26 +0100 Jens Bech Madsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a �crit:
> Hardly surprising when you don't run nautilus :-) > > If you want Gnome to draw your desktop, you need to run Nautilus. > That's the way it is done in Gnome. I think it's wrong. We do not need to have Nautilus installed and running to be running Gnome 2. That's my case, i use ROX for my file manager and nothing for my desktop (don't want and don't need icons on it). I don't see why i must have Nautilus running to be able to easily draw a background on my desktop. But this argument isn't that good, it's for my special case. Let's see a better one : setting my background image is done with a Gnome preference, not a Nautilus one. I do not need nautilus to be able to set it. Why should i have to be running Nautilus for it to be set or changed ?! So, if nautilus is launched, it should take care of the background, if not, Gnome should take care of it. Just like it was in Gnome 2.2 Julien
