Le mar 09/03/2004 � 17:17, Ross Burton a �crit : > > I think there is a better chance of G2.6 getting in testing if it is > > worked on in unstable. Even though G2.4 is 'frozen' in testing, I > > think that an attempt should be made to get G2.6 in testing and > > getting G2.6 in unstable is the fastest way to do that. > > But what if we don't make it? There will be a possibly buggy G2.4 in > testing, which we cannot correct easily. By putting G2.6 into > experimental we keep it separate until it's ready, at which point we > push into unstable. If we start to realise we're not going to make 2.6 > for Sarge, we've got a fallback position with no hastle.
If we'll putting Gnome 2.6 into unstable and there were are some RC bugs, what's matter ? Theses packages cannot be pushed into testing... -- Rapha�l "SurcouF" Bordet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
