Le mar 09/03/2004 � 08:07, Akira TAGOH a �crit : > >>>>> On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 01:43:56 -0500, > >>>>> "JM" == John McCutchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > JM> Why keep it in experimental? packages in testing exist with newer > JM> versions in unstable. I don't see why we should hold back the gnome > JM> version in unstable until testing is released as stable. > > Because sid isn't used as intended purpose anymore. > > I would ask you. why do you need gtk+ 2.4 and GNOME 2.6 so > much in the unstable? do you have any objection except "I > just want to play it. but it's hard time to me to install it > from experimental."
Evolution 1.5.5 goes to experimental because of it's a devel version. If GTK+ 2.4 and Gnome 2.6 will be release as stable by Gnome project, why would you put it into experimental ? > We will have to test some anyway-- especially debian > specific thing. of course when it's time to do that > globally, it will be in the unstable. However AFAIK we > haven't done anything yet. > Doesn't it make sense? If they packages will be put into unstable, they can't be uploaded to testing if they're many RC's bugs, so... -- Rapha�l "SurcouF" Bordet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
