On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 13:47, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 05:58, John McCutchan wrote: > >> I am just wondering what the plan is for gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.6 getting > >> in to unstable? Since gnome 2.4 is in testing and testing's gnome is > >> frozen does this mean that gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.6 can go in to unstable > >> right away? > > > > My preferred course of action would be to upload GTK+ 2.4 into unstable > > pretty quickly as it is an independent library, but build GNOME 2.6 into > > experimental. > > Sorry I was away some days > > Just to give my opinion I'd like to start to upload Gnome2.6 & GTK2.4 in > experimental ASAP (we can start with preleases) and move all that in > unstable when it'll be ready.
True, no reason why the beta releases and the RC's couldn't start getting packaged. They shouldn't change drastically from the final releases should they? > > Cheers, > > Sebastien Bacher -- Link Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
