Em Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:44:58 +0900, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Hi, > > > There's been some discussion at the #gnome-debian channel about > > package naming for some shared libraries. Specifically, people > > were discussing if libgnome-keyring, which has the following > > library should be named: /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.0. > > The package was named libgnome-keyring-0, afaik. > > > AFAICT, I've summed up in 'Naming library packages' in libpkg-guide, > and created a little shell script 'd-shlibs' which contains > a shell snippet to generate a package name from shared library name. > > The logic used in the shell script is really simple; > remove the .so., and add a '-' if it's ambiguous. So, it seems to me like we do have a naming problem with some libs, that should be named, for example, libgnome-2-0. I am willing to go through the gnome packages and find such inconsistencies to file bug reports about them, but I think we should have the renaming scheduled for gnome2.6, leaving gnome2.4 in its current state. (Maybe I could even extend that research to all of Debian, but I'd rather try it out with GNOME first). So, what do you think? Shall I proceed? Thanks, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org> "NÃo deixe para amanhÃ, o WML que vocà pode traduzir hoje!" http://debian-br.alioth.debian.org/?id=WebWML
