Hi, On Tue, Sep 27, 2005, Robert Hart wrote: > I think there is a fine line between "encouraging gnucash to make the > transition" and "forcing gnucash to do it now". I would hope the gnucash > developers are well aware by now that GTK+1 is not a long term solution, > but I don't think a rushed port to GTK+2 will help anybody achieve > anything. > > given that gtk+1 is in sarge, and so must be supported to some extent > until etch is released, it doesn't seem like there is going to be any > extra work provided that the transition occurs before then.
It's not only Gtk 1 versus Gtk 2, Gnucash relies on the whole GNOME 1 stack of libraries. Removing Gtk 1 would concern many more packages. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
