On Thu, Nov 03, 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > Do you really think this is worse than X shipping static libraries ? I mean > building X already used to need many GB of free disk space, and i have some > doubts that gtk+ will be more disk-space hungry, but i could be wrong.
Yes, gtk needs more space than xorg. Have a look at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gtk%2B2.0&ver=2.6.2-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1107973275&file=log&as=raw (2451432k) http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-x11&ver=6.8.2.dfsg.1-9&arch=m68k&stamp=1129641779&file=log&as=raw (1660956k) -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
