On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:50:28AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > Do you really think this is worse than X shipping static libraries ? I mean > > building X already used to need many GB of free disk space, and i have some > > doubts that gtk+ will be more disk-space hungry, but i could be wrong. > > Yes, gtk needs more space than xorg. Have a look at: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gtk%2B2.0&ver=2.6.2-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1107973275&file=log&as=raw > (2451432k) > > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=xorg-x11&ver=6.8.2.dfsg.1-9&arch=m68k&stamp=1129641779&file=log&as=raw > (1660956k)
Well, not much more though, and i remember older X builds which needed well over 2GB (i think XFree86 needed 4GB or so back in those days, where i still had my apus amiga). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
