On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2008 17:14:47 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> * Sebastien was once declared heroic for frantically packaging and >> uploading GNOME 2.24 stuff after its release for which I'm also >> grateful, but then he refrained from uploading Nautilus 2.24 to Sid, >> choosing instead Experimental. I would really have preferred that she >> mentioned this on the mailing list and not just the Debian changelog. So >> what's still holding back Nautilus into entering Sid? > > I'm assuming you're talking about nautilus 2.22 here. One reason for the > delay is that the upstream nautilus developers decided to take over most > of gnome-volume-manager's functionality, without actually co-ordinating > with the gnome-volume-manager developers. The result was that both > nautilus and gnome-volume-manager tried to handle the mounting of disks, > etc. > > I've been tracking the situation at <http://wiki.debian.org/Gnome/ > nautilus_vs_gnome-volume-manager>. Most of these issues have been fixed > with the latest releases of gnome-volume-manager, however there is still > one bit of overlapping functionality: both nautilus and gnome-volume- > manager try to handle digital cameras. We should probably patch this > functionality out of one or the other. > > I think that nautilus 2.22.2 and gnome-volume-manager 2.22.5 are ready > for unstable: I have been using them since they appeared in experimental, > and I really like GVFS and nautilus' new cluebar and media handling > functionality.
I saw you did quite a bit of work sorting this mess, whose existence I wasn't aware. Thanks much... -- my place on the web: floss-and-misc.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
