On Sat, May 17, 2008, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > In too many places has it been declared buggy and dead upstream, that > rarian should replace it.
Do you have more specifics? We don't really have a formal process to propose new features to Debian or Debian GNOME; we only have release goals and DEPs AFAIK, but this is moving. What we currently do is that we rely on individuals to discuss high level features / goals, then implement them by requesting / doing the technical changes. If I were asked now to switch to rarian, I would point at the risk of changing to a new codebase and would ask for some proven benefits. Perhaps you can start building a wiki page documenting: - known new features (could be performance, code quality etc.) - known regressions - known bugs in scrollkeeper which are fixed in rarian This would help convincing people like me; if nothing comes in the way, you could immediately start proposing patches to prefer rarian over scrollkeeper. Bye -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
