On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 06:27:37PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > So unless I completely missunderstood Chris this should work. We'll have a > libqpe1, a libqpe1-sharp, and a libqpe1-ipaq.
Sounds good. > Now...what we may need to do is create some meta packages. one for ipaq > and one for sharp that will depend on the proper packages to make up the > base system. I had been thinking that it would also be a good idea to provide both X11 and framebuffer environments, since there almost certainly won't be room for both in the base image. I assume that opie needs to be built differently for X11 and Qt/e, though I haven't looked at this at all really. I have an xfree86-tinyx deb (in unstable) which runs X on the framebuffer and supports the Zaurus touchscreen, using a daemon which translates the Zaurus touchscreen events into equivalent iPAQ touchscreen events (which xfree86-tinyx supports). It's a little rough, but does work. Eventually, it would be nice for xfree86-tinyx to support the Zaurus touchscreen natively and get rid of the daemon hack. Ideally, we would be able to support configurations like: - opie on qt/e - opie on x11 - traditional x11 with matchbox and a menu of some sort This might be a little ambitious for the first cut of the packages, if it's nontrivial, but it's something to keep in mind. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
