On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 12:09:00AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:09:00PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > > I guess my question would be what do we currently "need". Is there a > > current need for both x11 & qt/e versions of opie on all archs? > > > > We can provide both x11 & qt/e versions of opie but that of course doubles > > the amount of packages. I know we all just love hearing that evil word > > from the ftp guys "bloat". :) > > My view is that one of the most compelling reasons for basing this system on > Debian is to take advantage of the wealth of software that is easily > available and integrated. In the case of GUI applications, these are almost > exclusively X11 applications.
well...what we can do is this. 1st round of opie packages will be Qt/E based. Once they are functional (from a Debian packaging/functionality perspective) I'll put out a X11 based opie set. Ivan -- ---------------- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
