Am Freitag, 24. Juli 2009 16:36 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 14:30 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > > On 24 Jul 2009, at 14:10, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > there is also the relatively common variant "agda-bin". > > > > How is this any better than -executable though? Seems to me like the > > same issues apply to both. > > it is more common, and will be understood as "containing the programs > from the set of agda-related packages": > > $ grep-aptavail -F Package -s Package -r -- -bin$ | wc -l > 142 > $ grep-aptavail -F Package -s Package -r -- -executable$ | wc -l > 0 > > But it’s just a suggestion, I don’t mind -executable.
Isn’t there some Debian convention about this? I thought it was appending “-cli” but maybe the “-cli” packages I found were about the Common Language Interface. I think, package naming should be consistent within Debian, so I don’t think it’s a good thing to use “-executable”. Best wishes, Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
