Done. Am Mittwoch, den 25.09.2019, 11:28 +0000 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > Joachim, your trick worked, as well as my give-backs :) > > Can you please start again binNMUing stuff? > > Looks like ghc 8.6 built with 8.4 has a different hash compared with ghc 8.6 > built with ghc 8.6... > So, a few binNMus are required now on bootstrapped archs... > (I wasn't aware of such "-prof" changes) > > G. > Il sabato 21 settembre 2019, 10:30:10 CEST, Gianfranco Costamagna > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > thanks you both! > yes, my list had double packages (I'm pretty sure nmu will disregard > duplicated lines), > and most important, some binNMUs on armhf scheduled after 11 of septembers > were already good, because they picked up the "good" ghc and didn't depend on > anything that picked up the bad one. > > But that said, all the haskell binNMUs will take a couple of hours, and have > low priority, so they won't hurt too much :) > > G. > > Il sabato 21 settembre 2019, 09:50:28 CEST, Joachim Breitner > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > Am Samstag, den 21.09.2019, 10:49 +0300 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis: > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:40AM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > just scheduled… > > > > ACK. I will close by bug. > > > > Also, Gianfranco's list had a typo in the version of `haskell-http` and > > was missing hslogger: > > > > nmu haskell-http_1:4000.3.14-1 . armhf . sid . -m 'rebuild with > > ghc_8.8.1+dfsg1+is+8.6.5+dfsg1-1' > > nmu hslogger_1.2.12-1 . armhf . sid . -m 'rebuild with > > ghc_8.8.1+dfsg1+is+8.6.5+dfsg1-1' > > > > Could you please schedule them as well? > > > done > > -- > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner • [email protected] • https://j.oach.im/ > > -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner • [email protected] • https://j.oach.im/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
