Hi! >>>>> Santiago Vila writes:
SV> Please, do not upload them to the main archives untile they have SV> proper names, compatible with the earlier ones: glibc2, SV> glibc2-dev and such. ... but the whole point of this particular libc package is that it is backwards compatible with the existing Debian GNU/Linux pre-2.1 packages. This will allow us to merge our changes into Dale Scheetz's official pre-2.1 package when it comes out, rather than maintaining a separate glibc package. Wouldn't the right thing be to add a ``Replaces: glibc2'' line to my package, rather than making the package names inconsistent with the Linux versions? I'm sure there are other issues, too... -- Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/) Lovers of freedom, unite! \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/) [Unfortunately, www.fig.org is broken. Please stay tuned for details.]
