On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Keep in mind that it is very likely that somewhere in the future we > will have to bump the libc soname for the Hurd, because the idea is to > switch from GNU stdio to libio (which is used for Linux). If the name > is used for dpendencies, I think both glibc2 and libc6 are a bad > choice for the Hurd. The current soname is libc.so.0.2 which suggest > that you should use something like libc0_2.
Does this mean that some day there will be some move like the libc5 -> libc6 in Linux and that we will have to recompile everything? [ I would agree that "libc0.2" is the best name, then ]. -- "1c626ad9bd9c75713c32f0e31c51443e" (a truly random sig)
