Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uh-oh :) I think I will have to change the path, then. > We don't want a local -> . symlink, do we?
Ack, no! It sounds like it did not get compiled with prefix=/. Thomas
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uh-oh :) I think I will have to change the path, then. > We don't want a local -> . symlink, do we?
Ack, no! It sounds like it did not get compiled with prefix=/. Thomas