In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >> 1.b) breaks Debian policy as it doesn't comply with file system >> standard. > >(1.b) is not true; I was very careful to make sure that the FSSTND >does not require a separate /usr. (You can't get rid of /usr, but you >can make it a symlink, and still comply with FSSTND.)
I stand corrected. Reading the archives on the GNU-Hurd web site led me to believe that it wasn't FSSTND compliant. This means that any Debian package which can't cope with having /usr a symlink to / breaks policy and needs to be corrected, so I guess I have already answered one of my previous questions to Marcus. However, I bet FSSTND never intended /usr to point to / ;-) -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
