Marcus Brinkmann wrote: >> This means that any Debian package which can't cope with having >> /usr a symlink to / breaks policy and needs to be corrected, so >> I guess I have already answered one of my previous questions >> to Marcus. > >Mmmmh. Reading a standard, I can't find this. Why does it "breaks policy"? >The standard says nothing about /bin and /usr/bin carrying the same file, >(or the same for /lib). This seems to be unspecified.
>From memory, the Debian policy requires programs to adhere to the FSSTND - hence if a program won't work with FSSTND, it also breaks Debian policy. Please correct me if I am wrong though. Of course, it is open to debate exactly what they meant when they wrote the FSSTND... Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
