On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 11:06:32PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Two issues then arise: > a) Is Hurd going to develop to the point where it can support a system > relatively comparable in functionality to systems based on Linux?
IMO, the only way, that will give hurd a future, is, that is comes to a point, where it can be used as a drop in replacement for the linux kernel. It must be possible to simply replace the Linux kernel + the core libraries by the hurd core + compatibility libraries. Once that has happened the qualities of the kernel design can be compared directly and it will show, whether the microkernel really proves superior in practial usage. Even the learning curve for switching from Linux to Hurd must be zero. I do not think hurd will be able to beat Linux in any point that is of interest to someone who just wants to *use* the system. (Even app-programmers usually belong in there) Therefore we must be able to say, there are *no* drawbacks whatsoever. > b) Is there some compelling purpose that Hurd can serve that Linux > inherently *cannot?* I do not think so. It is just the cleaner design, but that is only of interest to those who want to hack it. Ciao, Nobbi -- -- ______________________________________________________ -- JESUS CHRIST IS LORD! -- To Him, even that machine here has to obey... -- -- _________________________________Norbert "Nobbi" Nemec -- Hindenburgstr. 44 ... D-91054 Erlangen ... Germany -- eMail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tel: +49-(0)-911-204180
