Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 20 May 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > What I want to know, is why can't existing locations be used for what hurd > > > developers want to place in /hurd. > > > > They can be, but they shouldn't be. > > This is not a reason. List the reasons.
I wonder if you've been paying attention. Here are some: * User convenience in typing pathnames. * Transparency. * Difference between these binaries and other binaries in their execution context * Historical practice There are more, but this is a brief list of some of the ones that have come up with so far. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
