Oystein Viggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There might be some tricks I don't know of to make this work also for > passive translators, but currently, it does not seem to work "out of the > box". I can't think of any situation where this would be particularly > useful, anyway.
The main reason I asked this is that I wondered whether this would be another reason to use `/hurd' for storing translators instead of something like `/lib' or `/bin'. It's not that I personally need to be convinced that `/hurd' is the right place -- I see enough reason for this already. But if using `/lib/hurd to store translators for example would make it impossible (or at least difficult) to translate `/lib' with something like shadowfs/unionfs etc. then I thought this would be a reason that maybe everyone could accept... Regards, Lars -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
