I agree that we should not have a fictitious /dev/urandom, but we should support ssh even so.
Open SSH is supported, in an insecure way, by either a random translator, or the copying hack.
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Neal H. Walfield
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Jeff Bailey
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Neal H. Walfield
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- mailing list admin-stuff (was: Re: ssh, /dev/urandom) Budi Rahardjo
- Re: mailing list admin-stuff (was: Re: ssh, /dev/uran... Jeff Bailey
- Re: mailing list admin-stuff Oystein Viggen
- Re: mailing list admin-stuff (was: Re: ssh, /dev/uran... Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Philip Charles
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Hubert Chan
- Re: ssh, /dev/urandom Philip Charles
