s�n 2005-02-06 klockan 15:33 +0100 skrev Alfred M. Szmidt: > I'm guessing by your use of 'the old OSKit-Mach' that this > is no longer the development branch being used for the hurd u-kernel? > > I think Joachim meant that GNU Mach 2.x was something nobody is really > hacking on, where people still send patches and fixes for GNU Mach > 1.x.
Yes, thanks. > I don't want to start down the path of debugging this if the > development is being done elsewhere, > > It is a good learning experience, and it would fix a bug. So you > shouldn't be discouraged to work on this even if people are working on > something else. If the boot bug in OSKit-Mach could get fixed then I'd be a happy man, but imo there are more important bugs to be focusing on. Personally I have a lot more faith in the L4 stuff than in the intermediate, and almost dead end, OSKit-Mach. Regards /Jocke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
