Michael Banck, le Wed 08 Aug 2007 19:35:08 +0200, a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:47:21PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > We remember we had issues with static linking recently, should I > > > downgrade gcc-4.2 or does the culprit lie elsewhere? > > > > Which version of gcc-4.2 is that? I've used 4.2.1-0 with no problem. > > Bah, the same one. > > (static linking prints out the notice about madvise() not being > implemented, but that should hurt that much, right?)
Posix explicitely says that madvise() doesn't matter at all but performance :) I've notified libc maintainers that this warning is spurious (unfortunately, we will always get it when statically linking) but they don't care. I could commit a fix to drop it in debian until madvise somehow gets implemented, though. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
