Richard Braun, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 11:20:01 +0100, a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:05:37AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > In addition to that, it might be better for performance to rather > > remember how much memory was previously allocated, and only reallocate > > if more memory is needed, and twice as much, so as to reduce the amount > > of free/malloc calls. > > I'd suggest using a base size of e.g. 64 or another power of two close > to the expected common size, instead of "twice as much".
Why? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
