On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:26:26AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I'd suggest using a base size of e.g. 64 or another power of two close
> > to the expected common size, instead of "twice as much".
> 
> Why?

It should reduce fragmentation in most memory allocators and it's also
quicker to multiply.

-- 
Richard Braun


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to