On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 11:46 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:41:50AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 09:43 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Svante Signell, le Wed 27 Mar 2013 09:17:50 +0100, a écrit : > > > > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 01:51 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: .. > > I was referring to a debian maintainer adding a hurd-specific patch into > > sid->testing, that won't happen. These bug reports+patches are just > > rotting in the BTS until Wheezy is released. Am I missing something > > here? > > After wheezy is released, those patches will hopefully be applied, > the packages built again and they return to the archive.
If they are removed they have to be re-introduced again after Wheezy. What's the practical difference to keeping them cluttering the archive? Does this affect the Wheezy release at all? > I don't think you're missing something, but I don't see what you're > getting at, either. Maybe the above questions clarifies things, I'm mainly interested in the procedures related to a release (and the relation to architectures currently relegated to -ports, and the best way for Hurd to enter testing after Wheezy) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
