On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 11:46 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:41:50AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 09:43 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Svante Signell, le Wed 27 Mar 2013 09:17:50 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 01:51 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > .. > > > I was referring to a debian maintainer adding a hurd-specific patch into > > > sid->testing, that won't happen. These bug reports+patches are just > > > rotting in the BTS until Wheezy is released. Am I missing something > > > here? > > > > After wheezy is released, those patches will hopefully be applied, > > the packages built again and they return to the archive. > > If they are removed they have to be re-introduced again after Wheezy. > What's the practical difference to keeping them cluttering the archive? > Does this affect the Wheezy release at all?
The practical difference is that they do not clutter up the archive and we are being nice citizens. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
