On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:46:03PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > Hi, > > I usually use poedit for translation work. It works very well for me, I > only missed a spellchecker, so I added aspell support to it. I already > send it upstream, but thought I couldn't hurt to let you guys test it. > You can find a i386 binary at: > > http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/poedit/poedit_1.2.4-2.1.aspell_i386.deb > > The .dsc and .diff.gz are in the same dir. > > Note this is still version 1.2.4, the 1.2.5 version of poedit seems to > have problems (see Christians post of few days ago). Also note that > you'll need some aspell dictionaries to really use it
Tim, if you are a C++ guy, could you please try to fix #232625? The problem is quite simple, but I am unable to fix it due to my poor knowledge of C++, and I do not know whether upstream is working on it (he did not reply to Christian at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=896320&group_id=27043&atid=389153) The problem is that "#:" and "#," lines have a special processing, but not "#." which are inserted by xgettext when comments are found in source files. As a result such comments are treated like translator comments: they are editable, and written back as "# " which is pretty annoying because xgettext will add them again. They should instead be displayed as not-editable text, and of course not be changed when writing PO files. If this cannot be easily done, a compromise would be to only display source comments but not translator comments, IMO they are more important. Denis
