Christian Perrier-(e)k esan zuen: > Quoting Jens Seidel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > * Which of these would be more logical to ask for: > > > debian-user-basque or debian-110n-basque? It would be interesting to > > > create > > > debian-user-basque to see if we can strengthen the community but if it > > > weren't used to solve user doubts, we shouldn't´use it to > > > manage issues related to 110n on a user team. > > > > Maybe you should start with debian-l10n-basque. If there will be one > > time also not translation specific questions you could ask again for > > a debian-user-basque list. > > I agree that -l10n-basque makes more sense, in my opinion and from > what I know of the current activities of the Basque l10n community in > Debian. >
Thank you very much every by the quick reply. I open a bug to request debian-l10n.basque, if anybody or any group is interested on this petition result the bug is this [1] [1] - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470538 -- Piarres Beobide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
