Quoting Michal ??iha?? ([email protected]): > Dear Debian I18N people, > > I would like to know if some of you would be interested in translating > rpm. > > Please send the updated file to me, or submit it as a wishlist bug > against rpm. > > The package will be uploaded to unstable immediately due to severity of bug it > fixes, but I will incorporate translations ASAP. > > If you have read so far, please find the POT file in attachment.
Thanks, Michal, for taking care to call for translations. That's appreciated.
Still, I have a few comments:
- this debconf template is likely to be considered debconf abuse
("debconf notes are Evil"...:-))
- nevertheless, the English version should be reviewed by
debian-l10n-english. I can at least spot "with new version" which
is IMHO missing an article
What I suggest:
- Discuss the real need for a debconf note. You maybe take care to
display that one in very specific occasions, trying to not interrupt
the installation for no reason
- If the note is kept, then have it reviewed in debian-l10n-english
before calling for translations. If you want, this can be
coordinated by someone from debian-l10n-english (me or someone
elese)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
