Hi Dne Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:18:37 +0200 Christian Perrier <[email protected]> napsal(a):
> Quoting Michal Čihař ([email protected]): > > > > - Discuss the real need for a debconf note. You maybe take care to > > > display that one in very specific occasions, trying to not interrupt > > > the installation for no reason > > > > It is shown only in case automatic upgrade from old version fails. > > > Maybe the "error" debconf type would be more appropriate, then? Well I read input validation errors in debconf-devel(7) and it lead me to direction it is not the right type in this case. But it looks more appropriate for this case than note... > > > - If the note is kept, then have it reviewed in debian-l10n-english > > > before calling for translations. If you want, this can be > > > coordinated by someone from debian-l10n-english (me or someone > > > elese) > > > > Sorry for missing this step, I probably should learn more about this > > topic. > > > Would you mind if I launch a formal review? No problem with that, you're welcome! -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
