Previously Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Well, IPv6 deployment effectively still being experimental, isn't that > acceptable for sarge?
Depends on how you define `effectively experimental'. A fair number of people are using it these days for real things. I receive mail via IPv6 for example and use IPv6 to log into my home systems (and hopefully soon work systems as well). > Or, alternatively, three modules, dns, dns4, and dns6. dns can continue > to work as it always has. That sounds like a better approach. > No idea. I guess if you reverse lookup an IPv6 address w/o dns6 it just > fails. It also means it is impossible to get both IPv6 and IPv4 lookups or you have to do two lookups instead of one lookup for any record. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wiggy.net/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
