Hi, as java-runtime is not a virtual package listed in the policy, I would say that it's worth a bug against gij, which should provide java1-runtime *and* java2-runtime (according to the current, in deed not really practicable policy).
Eric PS: no need to cc me on debian-java. > Any suggestions on this? I think having java1-runtime and java2-runtime > is meaningless in practice, but the policy calls for them and hsqldb > will probably not work with Java <<2 runtime. > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: Bug#360906: libhsqldb-java: should depend on java-runtime? > Date: Wednesday 05 April 2006 14:42 > From: Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Package: libhsqldb-java > Version: 1.8.0.2-2 > Severity: minor > > Hello, > > I'd like to completely get rid off the Sun JRE in favor of the GIJ, > but I can't, because > > - libhsqldb-java depends on java2-runtime > - gij-4.0 provides java-runtime and java1-runtime only > > I don't know anything about Java, so I'm not sure where it's the > problem: should libhsqldb-java depend on java-runtime or gij-4.0 > provide java2-runtime? > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
