I forgot a last missing bit for that sbt stack : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853733
F. On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:01:26 +0200, Frederic Bonnard <fre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Emmanuel/all, > > On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 00:06:41 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thank you for the summary Tom. How many people attended the BOF? > > > > On 08/09/2017 02:50 AM, Tom Marble wrote: > > > > > 1. Making openjdk-9 the default for buster > > > - Yes we should try to do this. > > > - We will gain some fixes for reproducible builds > > > > Do we know what has improved on the reproducibility side with OpenJDK 9? > > > > > > > - Chris West has done some excellent work trying to rebuild the > > > archive with openjdk-9 > > > - FYI: the next Ubuntu LTS in April would like to ship with openjdk-9 > > > > As the default JRE? That would be quite optimistic. > > > > > > > 2. Targets without HotSpot > > > - We could maintain this with gcj (despite gcj being dropped from > > > upstream) > > > > The number of packages runnable with GCJ is shrinking rapidly (Java 5 > > only). There is no point keeping it as an alternative for HotSpot. > > > > > > > 3. Scala > > > - We discussed the value of packaging sbt > > > - Need to fix a reproducible build problem to bring it from > > > experimental to stable > > > > What are the issues blocking SBT currently? > > I've sent a list of sbt related packages (for experimental) on mentors > some time ago that Andreas kindly sponsored them. All but one were accepted > by ftpmasters ; there's only scala-tools-sbinary remaining : I guess > it's being examined :) > https://mentors.debian.net/package/scala-tools-sbinary > > So at the moment, we have in experimental : > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/jawn > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/json4s > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sbt > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sbt-ivy > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sbt-launcher-interface > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sbt-serialization > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sbt-template-resolver > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sbt-test-interface > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/scala-pickling > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/scopt > > and waiting for scala-tools-sbinary. > > Some links : > ITP: simple-build-tool : > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639910 > RFS: scala-pickling : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855941 > https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2017/04/msg00004.html > > F. > > > > > > > > 4. Clojure > > > - Currently does not have JDK 9 support > > > - The Clojure Team will look into this with upstream > > > > Did you discuss if we keep the Java and Clojure teams/packages under the > > same umbrella? > > > > > > > 5. javadoc > > > - Our packages that are standards 4.0.1 compliant should support > > > "nodoc" > > > > maven-debian-helper will support the "nodoc" option in the next update, > > but some help from debhelper is still required to make it work with no > > other modification to the existing packages (see #871822). > > > > > > > - Some users appreciate offline access to docs > > > > I would add that we spent a non negligible amount of time maintaining > > these rarely used packages and dealing with their reproducibility > > issues. Besides the JDK and some very popular libraries I think we > > should drop them. > > > > > > > 6. Autopkgtest > > > - We should use this more > > > - Can include built-in tests > > > - We can (or autopkgtest already does) use 'ratt' to test reverse deps > > > > My understanding of autopkgtest was that it wasn't meant to execute the > > test suite already run at build time (i.e. mvn test). Maybe it could be > > used to run the Maven integration tests instead? > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > >
pgpBIbN_amn1o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
