Hi, A simple relocation in jtb fixed the FTBFS - tested for surefire, javacc-maven-plugin, hawtbuf, avro-java, and activemq-protobuf.
Regards, Tiago On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Tiago Daitx <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I tracked down this error to a change in jtb's pom.xml that changed > jtb's groupId. > > A commit [1] moved from using debian/pom.xml to using upstream's > pom.xml (introduced by [2]), but the problem is that groupId changed > from "edu.ucla.cs.compilers" (original pom.xml [3]) to "edu.purdue.cs" > (new pom.xml [4]). > > javacc-maven-plugin was affected by this and patching its pom.xml to > point to the new jtb's groupId solves the FTBFS. > > Regards, > Tiago > > [1] > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/jtb.git/commit/?id=aad5e32b35d9e20daad0cff34216978a0fa03cc9 > [2] > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/jtb.git/commit/?id=19bafc71af2bdb92a0abe47b01a0aa8504945cab > [3] > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/jtb.git/tree/debian/pom.xml?id=cffddde94d57ef60f7415f8c8d400a75ba4c0f30 > [4] > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/jtb.git/tree/pom.xml?id=19bafc71af2bdb92a0abe47b01a0aa8504945cab > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Markus Koschany <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi tony, >> >> Am 28.01.2018 um 17:57 schrieb tony mancill: >>> Hi Debian Java, >>> >>> I'm working on a package that depends on javacc via the >>> javacc-maven-plugin. The toolchain is broken at runtime and there is >>> also a FTBFS bug for javacc-maven-plugin [0], both of which appear >>> related to the the upload of jtb 1.4.12 [1]. >>> >>> First, I'd like to politely ask why the new version of jtb without an >>> update to javacc-maven-plugin, when that's its only r-dep in the >>> archive. Is jtb used in some other context that required the new >>> version? Or maybe the jtb update is the first step in updating the >>> toolchain? >>> >>> But primarily I'd like to know what efforts are in progress and how I >>> might help. Do we need both new javacc and javacc-maven-plugin >>> versions? Or can the existing versions be patched to work with the >>> newer jtb? In addition to the jbibtex package I'm working on, the FTBFS >>> for javacc-maven-plugin is going to transitively affect a number of >>> other packages. >> >> I suggest to reassign the FTBFS bugs that were caused by the update to >> jtb and then mark our packages as affected. For once we can't blame >> anyone from the team. :) I have no idea what exactly caused this >> regression and hope Ludovico, the maintainer of jtb, can chime in here. >> >> Regards, >> >> Markus >> > > > > -- > Tiago Stürmer Daitx > Software Engineer > [email protected] > > PGP Key: 4096R/F5B213BE (hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com) > Fingerprint = 45D0 FE5A 8109 1E91 866E 8CA4 1931 8D5E F5B2 13BE -- Tiago Stürmer Daitx Software Engineer [email protected] PGP Key: 4096R/F5B213BE (hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com) Fingerprint = 45D0 FE5A 8109 1E91 866E 8CA4 1931 8D5E F5B2 13BE
diff -Nru jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog --- jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog 2018-01-08 01:18:07.000000000 -0200 +++ jtb-1.4.12/debian/changelog 2018-03-02 01:13:00.000000000 -0300 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +jtb (1.4.12-1ubuntu1~01) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Relocate edu.ucla.cs.compilers:jtb:debian: + - fix a few packages FTBFS due to groupId change. (Closes: #887785). + + -- Tiago Stürmer Daitx <[email protected]> Fri, 02 Mar 2018 04:13:00 +0000 + jtb (1.4.12-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Markus Koschany ] diff -Nru jtb-1.4.12/debian/jtb.poms jtb-1.4.12/debian/jtb.poms --- jtb-1.4.12/debian/jtb.poms 2018-01-07 16:46:40.000000000 -0200 +++ jtb-1.4.12/debian/jtb.poms 2018-03-02 01:12:38.000000000 -0300 @@ -1 +1 @@ -debian/pom.xml +debian/pom.xml --relocate=edu.ucla.cs.compilers:jtb:debian
