Hi Andrius, On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:18:04AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > Some time ago I had attempted packaging new freehep-vectorgraphics, with > considerable success. However, I dropped the ball and did not upload it. > I have pushed my packaging to salsa [1].
Thanks a lot for the promising hint. > There is one issue, though. Old freehep-* JARs are split into multitude > of source and binary packages, while my packaging uses single source > package (I find it more convenient than splitting and linking) and > currently puts all the JARs in one binary package. One of the following > options has to be chosen: > > 1. Have only one binary package. This would have to replace all old > binary packages with Conflicts+Replaces. > > 2. Split JARs to resemble old binary packages. AFAIK, this would require > epoch (1:) for the new binary packages, as they would come from > different source package. > > I would probably go with the option 2. I admit I have no strong opinion on this as long as we will get a feature complete cjk package. Since you also are maintaining cjk would you volunteer to care for this? This would be really appreciated as a contribution to our covid-19 effort. Kind regards Andreas. > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/freehep-vectorgraphics -- http://fam-tille.de