> Ivan, you said several times that the "unstable" debs are more stable that > the potato ones, and that unstable was better than testing... I'm confused. > Are you sure ? What is better in unstable ?
heh...what I said is that if your running "woody/testing" then you should run the KDE/QT debs that are a part of "sid/unstable"...as they are closer matched to what your currently running..ie, built on the same libc and xlibs versions. Ivan -- ---------------- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
