Le Lundi 12 Mars 2001 09:37, Ivan E. Moore II a �crit : > > Ivan, you said several times that the "unstable" debs are more stable > > that the potato ones, and that unstable was better than testing... I'm > > confused. Are you sure ? What is better in unstable ? > > heh...what I said is that if your running "woody/testing" then you should > run the KDE/QT debs that are a part of "sid/unstable"...as they are closer > matched to what your currently running..ie, built on the same libc and > xlibs versions.
Oh, OK. That sounds more logical ;-) By the way at home I completely reinstalled my system and remained in pure potato (I used testing before). With the same KDE 2.1 packages, it is much faster than before ! -- Thibaut Cousin email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] web : http://clrwww.in2p3.fr
