-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 21 November 2001 18:04, Michael H�ckel wrote: > If it is really not possible to change that, wouldn't it then be > better to leave the whole KDE release in unstable until all > packages are ready for testing?
Wouldn't making all KDE packages depend on kdelibs=2.2.1 and kdebase=2.2.1 be enough? New packages would be held back then until these other packages went through. Actually, right now the problem is that KMail hasn't gotten through to testing yet but if the current KMail package depended on kdelibs=2.1.2 and kdebase=2.1.2 then these upgrades would be held back, too, right? - -- - -M - ------- Magnus von Koeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------ Georg-Westermann-Allee 76 / 38104 Braunschweig / Germany Phone: +49-(0)531/2094886 Mobile: +49-(0)179/4562940 lp1 on fire (One of the more obfuscated kernel messages) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7+/RsUIvM6e6BgFARAmEYAKDecUTTmfEZZGKN8nOU8+lLkXid1ACg5hk3 BBno7Y33j/JE3VkeP2rZ/VY= =MGBX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
